Return to :
or Access the .PDF & Presentation->:pattison02.pdf
Some
Clinical And Pathological Features Of Enteritis In Broilers
Observations
On Treatment In The UK
Mark
Pattison, D.V.M., MP Consulting
Introduction
The
appearance of wet litter with birds producing abnormally wet
droppings has become a regular feature of UK broiler production.It
is important to recognise the problem quickly, make an
appropriate diagnosis and treat as quickly as possible. It may
also be possible to anticipate when the problem may arise and
devise a preventive strategy to minimise the effects of the
disease.
Clinical
signs
The signs
of enteritis are seen at any time from about 15 days. The disease
is characterised by diarrhoea with the production of abnormally
wet droppings. The faeces usually have a larger volume, are pale
or viscous with an excess of fluid around them. The use of litter
boxes (described elsewhere) can be helpful in recognising the
early stages of the condition. At the onset of enteritis there is
normally an increase in water intake but sometimes there may
actually be a reduction in water consumption. Sometimes birds are
huddled with ruffled feathers but this is not a consistent
feature. Often selective feeding is reported where birds
flick feed or whole grains out of the pans onto the
litter. The end result is a reduction in growth and an adverse
effect on feed conversion. There are often secondary effects such
as an increase in leg problems due to osteomyelitis.
Post
mortem features
The signs
described above are similar for quite a broad range of
pathological lesions. The most severe lesions are seen in
necrotic enteritis, but these occur less frequently now, as most
cases of enteritis occur without mortality. Where death occurs,
the birds are usually in good condition with food in the crop and
gizzard indicating that death has been sudden. There is often a
greenish tinge on the abdomen and the intestinal tract is swollen
and flaccid, with a thin wall. There are usually focal areas of
ulceration or larger patches of necrosis, which ultimately
coalesce resulting in sloughing of the intestinal lining. It is
much more common to investigate cases of wet litter or enteritis
where no mortality has occurred. In this situation it is
convenient to examine six freshly culled birds per house. They
should be average birds neither the biggest nor the smallest. The
intestines are incised at three points to include the duodenum,
mid intestine and lower intestine. The aim is to follow the
digestive process and examine the contents to see if they become
progressively more solid. Where the enteritis is mild the wall of
the intestine maybe thinned,
ballooned
or slightly inflamed. The gut contents may be full of bubbles,
watery or contain viscous orange-coloured mucus. Occasionally the
contents appear yoghurt-like and the presence of whole
grains of wheat is indicative that digestion is not occurring
properly. This condition is often referred to as dysbacteriosis.
In many cases, there is no enteritis and the intestine contains
an abnormal amount of fluid, which is clear and like water. The
caecae may be dilated. It is important to distinguish this
condition from malabsorption syndrome which can produce similar
clinical signs, in particular selective feeding behaviour. Also
the possibility of coccidiosis either at a clinical or sub-clinical
level must be considered.
Prevention
and Treatment
Various
strategies have been employed within one integration with varying
degrees of success. These regimes have to be changed regularly because,
not surprisingly, the antibiotics become less effective over time.
Tylosin tartrate (Tylan®, Elanco Animal Health) was used in a
prevention programme for three crop cycles as follows:
Treatment
was given for two days at 14 and 15 days, repeated at 21 and 22
days at a dose of 100mg/5000 kg bodyweight. The farms were
categorised according to the effectiveness of the treatment. Of
78 farms, 55 completed three cycles of production without any
clinical signs of enteritis. On 15 farms, some or all the houses
had to be treated and the product used was amoxycillin.
Eight
farms did not receive the Tylan programme and all had to be
treated and amoxycillin was used.
After
three cycles, in order to prevent the response to Tylan becoming
less satisfactory, it was decided to rest this product.
Amoxycillin
has been used as the standard for treatment but proved not to be
effective in a prevention programme. There are signs, too, that
this product became less effective over time and several flocks
have had to be treated twice or even three times. Other
prevention programmes have been tried:
Penicillin
in starter crumb at 1.2 Kg/tonne for 10 days was not effective,
compared with two years ago when it worked well.
Lincospectin
at 50mg/Kg in water for 5 days at the start followed by
chlortetracycline at 20-25 days in feed was reasonably effective.
If
the
chlortetracycline was given earlier at 10-20 days, it was less
effective.
In
relatively mild cases it can be very difficult to decide whether
to treat.
There is
always the possibility that if you decide not to treat, feed
conversion will suddenly be lost with disastrous financial
consequences.
Conclusion
Some farms
are regularly affected by enteritis whereas others only see the
problem intermittently. So there must be important factors of
management and farm conditions which influence this syndrome. It
is quite clear that treating this condition with therapeutic
medicines is not
a
sustainable long-term proposition. A solution needs to be found
so that these important medicines are being used sparingly and
resistance does not become a problem. The answers may differ
between organisations and farms but will involve a combination of
more optimal management, nutrition and satisfactory control of
intercurrent disease.
The
Elanco Global Enteritis Symposium Some Clinical And Pathological
Features
July 9-11,
2002 Of Enteritis In Broilers Observations On Treatment In
The UK, Abstract, C2 to C-5