Return to :
or Access the .PDF & Presentation->:mortimer02.pdf
The
Detection of Dysbacteriosis
Iain
Mortimer, Elanco Animal Health
Introduction
Increasingly,
wet litter has been reported as a problem of the intensive
broiler industry. Many environmental, management and bird factors
contribute to litter quality. Recently, wet litter has been
directly linked to a poorly described digestive condition of
poultry known as dysbacteriosis. Enterome based
analytical methods have demonstrate that birds affected by this
condition have an increase in the size and change in the
composition of the normal duodenal bacterial flora (Panneman 2000).
It is hypothesised that this change in the microbial flora leads
to malabsorption and a deterioration in litter quality due to a
higher moisture content in the droppings of affected birds.
Well-managed
litter will have some absorptive capacity, consequently the
moisture content of affected birds is likely to be abnormally
high for a period of time before litter quality deteriorates
visibly. For that reason, a means of monitoring the moisture
content of the birds droppings, on a daily basis, would be
helpful in the early diagnosis of dysbacteriosis and in the
differentiation of this disease from management associated
problems.
The
Litter Box materials and methods
The litter
box is a simple device designed to allow the moisture content of
bird droppings to be measured. The droppings of birds, perched on
top of the box, pass through the grid on the top and fall onto
absorptive paper below. A moisture ring then spreads out from
this dropping, the extent of which would be directly proportional
to the moisture content of the dropping. (See Figures D-1 and D-2
on next page).
If
droppings are classified as wet or dry,
according to the extent of the moisture ring, (> 0.5cm
wet; < 0.5cm dry) then the proportion of wet
dropping over a given time period can be assessed on a daily
basis. The greater the proportion of wet droppings, the greater
the likelihood of the birds having dysbacteriosis and
subsequently, the litter becoming wet. The litter box can be used
thus as a diagnostic tool:
If
the proportion of wet droppings is below a lower cut off mark,
then the birds are unaffected and the litter will not become wet.
If
the proportion of wet droppings is above an upper cut off mark,
then the birds are affected and the litter will become wet.
If
the proportion of wet droppings is between the two cut off marks,
the test is inconclusive.
Figure
D-1. Litter Box.

Figure
D-2.
Computer
programmes are available to determine these cut off marks and
ensure that the number of false positives and false negatives are
acceptably low.
Results
The
diagnostic ability of the litter box was assessed over 150 farms
in the UK. Upper and lower cut off marks were determined, with
their corresponding positive and negative predictive values. For
the purposes of this assessment, each farm was given a score,
rounded
to the
nearest first decimal point, equal to the highest proportion of
wet droppings over two consecutive days. Farms were classified as
affected (litter assessed as wet by the farm manager
for two or more consecutive days) or unaffected. Farm
managers were given specific guidelines on how to assess the
litter quality. For each score, the number of affected and
unaffected farms was recorded. Results are shown in Figure D-3.
This
information was analysed using Win Episcope2.0® software (See
Figures D-4 & D-5).

Figure
D-3.
A lower
cut off of 0.2 gave a 95% negative predictive value and an upper
cut off of 0.5 gave a 100% positive predictive value.
Figure
D-4.
Figure
D-5.
Discussion
and conclusions
The
following guidelines were then recommended for use with the
litter box:
1.
Calculate the proportion of wet droppings, daily, over a two to
three hour period.
2. If the
value of the litter box score is less than 20%, wet litter should
not be a problem.
3. If the
litter box score rises above 20%, for two or more consecutive
days, then the farm is at risk of wet litter due to
dysbacteriosis.
4. If the
litter box score rises above 50%, for two or more days, then the
litter is highly likely to become wet and immediate action is
required.
Conclusion
The
presence of a qualitatively and/or quantitatively abnormal flora
in the small intestine (dysbacteriosis) can cause a diarrhoea ,
malabsorption and wet droppings. This in turn leads to wet litter.
Current knowledge shows that litterboxes can be used as an
indication of
increased
likelihood of wet litter occurring during a crop and can confirm
wet droppings as the causal factor.
References
1. Van der
Stroom, J. Geelen J and Pipers A, Mal-digested feces in relation
to intestinal aspecific bacterial overgrowth in broilers. In
press.
2.
Panneman, H. Clostridial enteritis/dysbacteriosis. Fast diagnosis
by T-RFLP, a novel diagnostic tool. Proceedings of Elanco
Symposium,
Montreal
2000.
The
Elanco Global Enteritis Symposium July 9-11, 2002 The Detection
of Dysbacteriosis,
Abstract,
D-3 to D- 7